The effect of geriatric intervention in frail older patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a randomised trial (GERICO).

Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. Cecilia.margareta.lund.01@regionh.dk. CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Cecilia.margareta.lund.01@regionh.dk. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark. Cecilia.margareta.lund.01@regionh.dk. Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. Nutritional and Dietetic Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. Department of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark. CopenAge, Copenhagen Center for Clinical Age Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.

British journal of cancer. 2021;(12):1949-1958

Abstract

BACKGROUND Older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) experience chemotherapy dose reductions or discontinuation. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) predicts survival and chemotherapy completion in patients with cancer, but the benefit of geriatric interventions remains unexplored. METHODS The GERICO study is a randomised Phase 3 trial including patients ≥70 years receiving adjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy for CRC. Vulnerable patients (G8 questionnaire ≤14 points) were randomised 1:1 to CGA-based interventions or standard care, along with guideline-based chemotherapy. The primary outcome was chemotherapy completion without dose reductions or delays. Secondary outcomes were toxicity, survival and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS Of 142 patients, 58% received adjuvant and 42% received first-line palliative chemotherapy. Interventions included medication changes (62%), nutritional therapy (51%) and physiotherapy (39%). More interventional patients completed scheduled chemotherapy compared with controls (45% vs. 28%, P = 0.0366). Severe toxicity occurred in 39% of controls and 28% of interventional patients (P = 0.156). QoL improved in interventional patients compared with controls with the decreased burden of illness (P = 0.048) and improved mobility (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION Geriatric interventions compared with standard care increased the number of older, vulnerable patients with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy, and may improve the burden of illness and mobility. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02748811.

Methodological quality

Metadata